MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EFFECT OF DEEP ANESTHESIA ON DEVELOPMENT OF POST-OPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION

2018· article· en· W2792900627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. V. Voysekhovskiy, D. A. Аveryanov, A. V. Schegolev, Dmitriy Svistov

Bibliographic record

VenueMessenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostoperative cognitive dysfunctionAnesthesiaCognitionMedicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The profound deepening of medicamentous sleep down to the burst-suppression electroencephalography pattern is used to provide medication-based protection of brain during preventive temporary clipping of the major arteries when performing surgery due to cerebral aneurysms. There is no consensus about the effect of profound suppression of electrobiological activity on the development of post-operative cognitive dysfunction. The goal: to evaluate the impact of anesthesia with the burst-suppression electroencephalography pattern on the post-operative cognitive status of the patients with no cerebral disorders. Subjects and methods. 30 patients were enrolled into the prospective randomized study, they all had surgeries due to degenerative spinal diseases. All patients were divided into two groups. Anesthesia in the main group (Group 1) differed from the one in the control group (Group 2); it included administration of propofol till achieving suppression of the electrobiological activity of burst-suppression electroencephalography pattern during 15 minutes. Prior to the surgery and in 4 days after it, all patients had neuro-psychological tests using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and numbers memorization techniques (NMT). Results. When testing in 4 days after surgery, results in the patients from Group 1 did not differ from pre-operative results of MoCA (Mebefore = 28, Meafter= 28, Z = 0.714, p = 0.476), FAB (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.592, p = 0.554), memorization of numbers in the direct order (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.178, p = 0.859) and in the reverse order (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.548, p = 0.583). The results of the post-operative testing in Group 2 were compatible with pre-operative results of (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.459, p = 0.646), FAB (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 1.348, p = 0.178), memorization of numbers in the direct order (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.21, p = 0.843) and in the reverse order (Mebefore = 18, Meafter = 18, Z = 0.809, p = 0.418). None of the tests detected significant differences between the Groups (U = 88, p = 0.319, Z = 0.995 for MoCA; U = 102.5, p = 0.644, Z = 0.394 for FAB; U = 92.0, p = 0.407, Z = -0.829 for memorization of numbers in the direct order, and U = 33.5, p = 0.62, Z = 0.572 for memorization of numbers in the reverse order). Conclusion. Anesthesia with burst-suppression electroencephalography pattern as a model of medication-based cerebral protection during temporary clipping of the major arteries does not cause the deterioration of cognitive status in the patients who had no cerebral pathology initially.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMessenger of Anesthesiology and ResuscitationSame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207