SOLIDARIDADES FUNDANTES ENTRE CIRCO Y LA GIMNASIA. MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY, SIGLO XIX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El estudio reflexiona en torno a las primeras experiencias de las prácticas gimnásticas vinculadas al circo en Uruguay. No se duda señalar al siglo XIX como momento fundante de aquel conjunto de prácticas que se dieron en llamar Educación Física. De ahí que se indaga en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX, específicamente en el período que va entre 1861 y 1871. Se busca explorar en el conjunto de saberes de la época en torno al circo: religiosos, científicos, mágicos. Ante dichos movimientos, se entiende pertinente recuperar algunos discursos con el propósito de comprender las relaciones de dominación que hicieron posible que la relación de la gimnasia con el circo y las prácticas artísticas se configurara de una manera y no otra, dando lugar a aquello que puede identificarse como prácticas corporales sometidas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".