Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for select patients with end-stage lung disease. However, successful lung transplantation is hampered by chronic lung allograft dysfunction, in particular bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Although there is no approved or standard treatment for BOS, which may have several distinct phenotypes, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has shown promising results in patients who develop BOS refractory to azithromycin treatment. METHODS: We reviewed all relevant clinical data indexed on PubMed from 1987 to 2017 to evaluate the role of ECP in patients with BOS. RESULTS: Seven small studies investigated the immunomodulatory effects of ECP in patients after solid organ transplant, and 12 studies reported clinical data specific to ECP therapy for BOS. Studies indicate that ECP triggers an apoptotic cellular cascade that exerts various immunomodulatory effects mediated via increases in anti-inflammatory cytokines, a decrease in proinflammatory cytokines, and an increase in tolerogenic regulatory T cells. Clinical evidence derived from relatively small single-center studies suggests that ECP therapy is associated with improvement or stabilization in lung function and sustainable, statistically significant, decreases in the rate of lung function decline in patients with BOS. Additionally, when adverse event data were reported, ECP was generally well tolerated. None of the comparative studies were randomized. CONCLUSIONS: Immunomodulation mediated via ECP is a rational therapeutic option that may improve clinical outcomes in patients with BOS, particularly in the context of in-depth patient phenotyping as part of a stratified approach to treatment; good quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm observational findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".