Temperature‐Induced Atomic Reconstruction At Au/MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Interfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The metal–oxide interaction, associated with intermingling delocalization of bonding electrons in metals and ionic bonds in oxides, may cause reconstruction of interface structure and accordingly affect physical properties of heterogeneous materials. This Communication reports reconstructions of (111) interface between gold and magnesium aluminate spinel according to experimental observation and theoretical prediction. Three interfacial structures are evidenced with respect to the arrangement of gold atoms: perfect Au (111) interface, atoms missing in the first Au (111) plane, and atoms mixing in the two adjacent atomic planes. Such atomic arrangements in the reconstructed interfaces are similar to those of metal cations in the spinel lattice, thus providing new insights into the chemistry and structure of metal–oxide interfaces and highlighting new pathways toward metal–oxide interface engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it