MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792960736 · doi:10.1097/dcc.0000000000000287

Pregnancy-Related Coronary Artery Dissection

2018· review· en· W2792960736 on OpenAlex
Julie R. Robinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDimensions of Critical Care Nursing · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScadArtery dissectionPregnancyMyocardial infarctionChest painGold standard (test)Emergency departmentCardiac catheterizationDifferential diagnosisDissection (medical)Acute coronary syndromePostpartum periodCardiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineCoronary angiographySurgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is a rare but life-threatening condition of the peripartum and postpartum mother. The gold standard of diagnosing P-SCAD is a left cardiac catheterization; however, this diagnostic tool may not be used early because myocardial infarction is not typically a top differential diagnosis for women and especially young pregnant women presenting with acute chest pain. Providers and registered nurses, particularly those in the prehospital setting, the emergency department, and labor and delivery units, should be aware of signs, symptoms, potential risk factors, and diagnostic results that could indicate P-SCAD and initiate early and appropriate treatment to improve maternal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it