MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792960736 · doi:10.1097/dcc.0000000000000287

Pregnancy-Related Coronary Artery Dissection

2018· review· en· W2792960736 on OpenAlexaff
Julie R. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueDimensions of Critical Care Nursing · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScadArtery dissectionPregnancyMyocardial infarctionChest painGold standard (test)Emergency departmentCardiac catheterizationDifferential diagnosisDissection (medical)Acute coronary syndromePostpartum periodCardiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineCoronary angiographySurgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is a rare but life-threatening condition of the peripartum and postpartum mother. The gold standard of diagnosing P-SCAD is a left cardiac catheterization; however, this diagnostic tool may not be used early because myocardial infarction is not typically a top differential diagnosis for women and especially young pregnant women presenting with acute chest pain. Providers and registered nurses, particularly those in the prehospital setting, the emergency department, and labor and delivery units, should be aware of signs, symptoms, potential risk factors, and diagnostic results that could indicate P-SCAD and initiate early and appropriate treatment to improve maternal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDimensions of Critical Care NursingSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207