MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792973834 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.316

A315 FREQUENCY AND PREDICTORS OF FASTING ORDERS IN INPATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS: THE AUDIT OF DIET ORDERS - ULCERATIVE COLITIS (ADORE-UC) STUDY

2018· article· en· W2792973834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineEnteral administrationParenteral nutritionGastroenterologyVomitingNauseaCohortInflammatory bowel diseaseRetrospective cohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current clinical practice guidelines suggest that ulcerative colitis (UC) patients admitted due to a disease flare should be offered a normal diet or enteral nutrition unless such a diet is not tolerated. Despite this recommendation, concerns about iatrogenic malnutrition from unjustified NPO or clear liquid diet (CLD) orders exist. We aim to describe the frequency and audit the appropriateness of NPO and CLD orders among hospitalized UC patients and identify predictors of unjustified fasting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all UC patients who were admitted to the gastroenterology (GI) service or the general internal medicine (GIM) service at an academic hospital between January 2009 and December 2014. The frequency and duration of bowel rest orders and the number of meals missed because of these orders were assessed. Bowel rest orders were considered justified if the patient had intractable nausea or vomiting, pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, toxic megacolon or were awaiting endoscopy, or if alternative enteral or parenteral nutrition was provided. Patients with unjustified fasting orders were identified and the number of missed meal opportunities was measured. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of unjustified fasting in admitted UC patients. A total of 187 admissions in 158 UC patients were identified during the study period and included in the final analysis. The majority of the admissions were under the GI service (148/187, 79.1%). The mean age at admission was 35.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 15) and 83/158 (52.5%) were female. The median length of stay was 8 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 4 – 12). Registered dietician consultation was obtained in only 32 admissions (17.1%), and admission weight was recorded in only 68 (36.4%) admissions. A total of 252 NPO or CF dietary orders were encountered in 142 admissions (75.9%). Of those, 112 orders were unjustified (44%). On average, patients with unjustified NPO or CF orders spent 3 days on an NPO or CF diet, which corresponded to a mean of 10 missed meals. Significant predictors of unjustified NPO or CF dietary orders were: NPO or CF diet ordered on admission [odds ratio, OR = 12.9, 95% confidence interval, 4.78–34.9]; admission to non-GI service [11.7, 95% CI 2.63–52.2], and lack of inpatient prednisone or biologics [3.4, 95% CI 1.4–11.6]. There is a high burden of prolonged bowel rest among hospitalized UC patients. Further studies are needed to assess the nutritional impact of prolonged bowel rest on UC patients. Our findings also suggest that targeted interventions are needed to decrease the frequency of inappropriate bowel rest among hospitalized UC patients. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it