MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792973834 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.316

A315 FREQUENCY AND PREDICTORS OF FASTING ORDERS IN INPATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS: THE AUDIT OF DIET ORDERS - ULCERATIVE COLITIS (ADORE-UC) STUDY

2018· article· en· W2792973834 on OpenAlexaff
Zane Gallinger, Geoffrey C. Nguyen, A.H. Steinhart, Kyle J. Fortinsky, Kevin Pivovarov, Amir Rumman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineEnteral administrationParenteral nutritionGastroenterologyVomitingNauseaCohortInflammatory bowel diseaseRetrospective cohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current clinical practice guidelines suggest that ulcerative colitis (UC) patients admitted due to a disease flare should be offered a normal diet or enteral nutrition unless such a diet is not tolerated. Despite this recommendation, concerns about iatrogenic malnutrition from unjustified NPO or clear liquid diet (CLD) orders exist. We aim to describe the frequency and audit the appropriateness of NPO and CLD orders among hospitalized UC patients and identify predictors of unjustified fasting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all UC patients who were admitted to the gastroenterology (GI) service or the general internal medicine (GIM) service at an academic hospital between January 2009 and December 2014. The frequency and duration of bowel rest orders and the number of meals missed because of these orders were assessed. Bowel rest orders were considered justified if the patient had intractable nausea or vomiting, pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, toxic megacolon or were awaiting endoscopy, or if alternative enteral or parenteral nutrition was provided. Patients with unjustified fasting orders were identified and the number of missed meal opportunities was measured. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of unjustified fasting in admitted UC patients. A total of 187 admissions in 158 UC patients were identified during the study period and included in the final analysis. The majority of the admissions were under the GI service (148/187, 79.1%). The mean age at admission was 35.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 15) and 83/158 (52.5%) were female. The median length of stay was 8 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 4 – 12). Registered dietician consultation was obtained in only 32 admissions (17.1%), and admission weight was recorded in only 68 (36.4%) admissions. A total of 252 NPO or CF dietary orders were encountered in 142 admissions (75.9%). Of those, 112 orders were unjustified (44%). On average, patients with unjustified NPO or CF orders spent 3 days on an NPO or CF diet, which corresponded to a mean of 10 missed meals. Significant predictors of unjustified NPO or CF dietary orders were: NPO or CF diet ordered on admission [odds ratio, OR = 12.9, 95% confidence interval, 4.78–34.9]; admission to non-GI service [11.7, 95% CI 2.63–52.2], and lack of inpatient prednisone or biologics [3.4, 95% CI 1.4–11.6]. There is a high burden of prolonged bowel rest among hospitalized UC patients. Further studies are needed to assess the nutritional impact of prolonged bowel rest on UC patients. Our findings also suggest that targeted interventions are needed to decrease the frequency of inappropriate bowel rest among hospitalized UC patients. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207