Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) with ongoing and timely medical, scientific, and public-health advice relating to tropical infectious disease and health risks associated with international travel.PHAC acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon the best current available scientific knowledge and medical practices, and is disseminating this document for information purposes to both travellers and the medical community caring for travellers.Persons administering or using drugs, vaccines, or other products should also be aware of the contents of the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use.Recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use by the licensed manufacturer(s).Manufacturers have sought approval and provided evidence as to the safety and efficacy of their products only when used in accordance with the product monographs or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use. PréambuleLe Comité consultatif de la médecine tropicale et de la médecine des voyages (CCMTMV) fournit à l'Agence de la santé publique du Canada (ASPC), de façon continue et en temps utile, des conseils de nature médicale, scientifique et de santé publique concernant les maladies tropicales infectieuses et les risques pour la santé associés aux voyages à l'étranger.L'ASPC reconnaît que les conseils et les recommandations figurant dans cette déclaration reposent sur la pratique médicale et les connaissances scientifiques les plus à jour, et les diffuse dans le but d'informer les voyageurs ainsi que les professionnels de la santé qui sont appelés à leur prodiguer des soins.Les personnes qui administrent ou utilisent des médicaments, des vaccins ou d'autres produits devraient bien connaître le contenu des monographies de produit ou des autres normes ou modes d'emploi approuvés.Les recommandations relatives à l'usage des produits et les autres renseignements présentés ici peuvent différer de ceux qui figurent dans la monographie ou toute autre norme ou instruction approuvée et pertinente établie par les fabricants autorisés.Rappelons que l'approbation demandée par les fabricants pour leurs produits, avec démonstration de leur innocuité et de leur efficacité à l'appui, ne s'applique qu'aux utilisations conformes à la monographie ou autre norme ou mode d'emploi approuvé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".