Facteurs environnementaux influençant la participation sociale d’élèves présentant un trouble primaire du langage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin de faciliter la participation sociale des enfants ayant un trouble primaire de langage (TPL), il est important de connaître les obstacles ou les facilitateurs environnementaux dans les milieux de vie de l’enfant. Le but de cette étude exploratoire est d’identifier ces facteurs pour des élèves du primaire ayant un TPL. Vingt-six parents d’enfants de 5 à 13 ans ayant un TPL et onze intervenantes scolaires ont rempli le questionnaireÉvaluation des facteurs environnementaux influençant la participation sociale des élèves du primaire présentant un trouble de la communication(Croteau et al., 2015b). Plusieurs facteurs des milieux scolaires et familiaux sont perçus comme étant des facilitateurs à la réalisation des habitudes de vie, tandis que des obstacles sont mentionnés à l’école, dans la famille et dans la communauté. Des cibles d’actions sont suggérées au plan de la disponibilité des services, de la réduction du bruit et de l’attitude des pairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".