MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793079995 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.305

A304 FOOD ANTIGEN-STRESS INTERACTION INCREASES PERIPHERAL PAIN SIGNALING IN A MOUSE MODEL OF IBS

2018· article· en· W2793079995 on OpenAlexaff
Cintya D. Lopez Lopez, Josue O. Jaramillo Polanco, S Vanner, David E. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminIrritable bowel syndromeRheobaseMedicineNociceptionHyperalgesiaSensitizationInternal medicineEndocrinologyAntigenImmunologyPharmacologyReceptorElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Food and stress are common triggers of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, it is unknown whether a specific food antigen alone can induce symptoms such as abdominal pain or if a second trigger, such as stress, is required for a food antigen to increase pain signaling. Aims To determine if a food antigen (ovalbumin) can induce hyperexcitabiity in nociceptive neurons alone and/or in combination with stress. Methods Mice were exposed to water avoidance stress (WAS; 1 hr for 6 days). On day 2, mice were gavaged ovalbumin (20mg) daily after completing WAS (WAS/OVA). These were compared to 3 groups: no WAS and no ovalbumin (control); WAS but no ovalbumin (WAS); and ovalbumin (OVA) alone. On day 8, WAS, OVA and WAS/OVA mice were given ovalbumin (50 μg) subcutaneously; 3 hours later euthanized. Colons were removed and incubated with ovalbumin (100 μg/ml) for 4 hrs. Supernatants were collected and DRG neurons from control mice were incubated overnight with supernatants from each of the four groups. Changes in neuronal excitability were examined by measuring the rheobase (minimal current to evoke an action potential) using perforated patch clamp recording techniques. Stress effects on intestinal permeability in the ileum and colon were assessed in Ussing chambers. One way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test or unpaired t test were used to analyze the data. Results Incubation with supernatants obtained from WAS/OVA mice evoked hyperexcitability in DRG neurons compared to incubation with control supernatant (rheobase: control = 82 ± 10 pA vs WAS/OVA = 56 ± 4 pA, p < 0.05). Similarly, WAS/OVA supernatant decreased the rheobase compared to both OVA mice (OVA = 80 ± 8 pA, p<0.05) and WAS mice (WAS = 81 ± 9 pA, p<0.05). The effect of supernatants from OVA mice and WAS mice did not differ from controls. In a separate series of experiments, the PAR2 antagonist GB83 inhibited the effect of WAS/OVA supernatant (p < 0.01). There was no effect of GB83 on WAS or OVA supernatants. Stress decreased tissue resistance in ileum (p<0.05) but not in colon. Conclusions The food antigen ovalbumin induced hyperexcitability in DRG nociceptive neurons only when combined with stress. This action was PAR2 dependent suggesting a role of tissue proteases. Stress may cause a loss of oral tolerance to ovalbumin by increasing mucosal permeability in the small intestine. The interaction of food antigens and stress may be a mechanism of meal induced increase in abdominal pain in IBS. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→