MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793121555 · doi:10.1002/2017jc013583

Climate Change Projected to Exacerbate Impacts of Coastal Eutrophication in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

2018· article· en· W2793121555 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Acidification Effects and Responses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCenter for Sponsored Coastal Ocean ResearchNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsEutrophicationHypoxia (environmental)Ocean acidificationEnvironmental scienceUpwellingOceanographyClimate changeStratification (seeds)BiogeochemistryBiogeochemical cycleNutrientEcologyEnvironmental chemistryGeologyOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico experiences expansive seasonal hypoxic conditions and eutrophication‐driven acidification in bottom waters. Rising surface ocean temperatures, freshwater and nutrient inputs, and atmospheric CO 2 will further exacerbate these conditions. Using a high‐resolution, regional circulation‐biogeochemical model, we simulated the spatiotemporal dynamics of oxygen and inorganic carbon in the northern Gulf of Mexico under present and a projected future (2100) climate state. Results indicate a modest expansion of the hypoxic zone, but more severe hypoxia and greater exposure to prolonged hypoxic conditions. The main drivers underlying these changes are a reduction in oxygen solubility (accounting for 60–74% of the change) and increased stratification (accounting for less than 40%). pH is projected to decrease across the shelf with lowest values in hypoxic waters where aragonite saturation will approach the saturation limit. In the model simulations, acidification is primarily driven by atmospheric and offshore CO 2 levels, while the enhancement in stratification only accounts for 7% or less of the total change in pH. Decreased buffering capacity and increased stratification in the future will enhance respiration‐induced acidification (i.e., a decrease in bottom water pH by respired CO 2 ), which will amplify the climate‐induced acidification. According to the model, the magnitude of future changes varies significantly from year to year. The largest effects are simulated in years with large freshwater discharge and upwelling‐favorable winds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it