MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793122584 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.140

A139 ASYMPTOMATIC IBD IS A COMMON FINDING IN FIT POSITIVE INDIVIDUALS

2018· article· en· W2793122584 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan I. Quinlan, Mark Borgaonkar, Scott Antle, David Pace, Jerry McGrath

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColonoscopyAsymptomaticColorectal cancerInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyDiseaseCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory Bowel Disease is often present for months and even years before a formal diagnosis is made. This time represents a missed opportunity for early intervention that may have a significant impact on disease course and prevent unnecessary surgeries. The purpose of this study was to assess findings of undiagnosed IBD within Newfoundland and Labrador from the provincial colon cancer screening program. Data for this study was obtained in a prospective fashion using the Newfoundland and Labrador Colon Cancer Screening Program. Those enrolled in the study were between the ages of 50–74 at average risk for colon cancer. Between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2016, participants were provided with two FIT tests – if a minimum of one test was ≥100ng/mL, participants were further evaluated via colonoscopy. Data on the patient’s age, gender, FIT value, presence of adenoma, pathology, and other variables were collected. Of the 21,371 FIT kits mailed out, 16,152 (75.6%) were returned, of which, 2694 (16.7%) had at least one FIT value ≥100ng/mL. At the time of analysis, 1831 participants had been further evaluated by colonoscopy. Colonoscopy identified 35 patients (1.9%) with undiagnosed inflammatory bowel disease, confirmed by pathology. Of those found to have IBD, 57.1% were female, 42.9% were male, and 54.3% had two positive FIT values. The age of those with IBD ranged from 50–71 with a mean of 59.5. The highest FIT value of those with IBD ranged from 100.0 to 18877.0 with a mean of 2048.1, 25th percentile of 180, 50th percentile of 518, and 75th percentile of 1463. For comparison, the mean highest FIT value for those with colon cancer was 4219.8, for those with an adenoma was 1140.2 and for those with no finding was 580.4. This study shows that undiagnosed inflammatory bowel disease in the fifth to seventh decade of life is not an uncommon occurrence. The prevalence of diagnosed IBD in Canada is estimated to be 0.428%, with 0.194% having ulcerative colitis and 0.234% having Crohn’s disease. Of the 16,152 participants who returned their FIT test, 0.27% were found to have undiagnosed IBD. These findings suggest that there is a substantial burden of undiagnosed IBD in Newfoundland and Labrador. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→