Simultaneous Fabrication and Functionalization of Nanoparticles of 2D Materials with Hybrid Optical Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A general, rapid technique is introduced to simultaneously fabricate and functionalize nanoparticles of 2D materials. A femtosecond laser is used to irradiate flakes of 2D materials in an ethanol‐containing solvent. The highly energetic laser pulses exfoliate and cleave the flakes into nanosheets with diameters of ≈3 nm and simultaneously dissociate the solvent molecules. The dissociated carbon and oxygen atoms bond with the freshly cleaved 2D nanoparticles to satisfy edge sites, resulting in the formation of hybrid 2D nanoparticles that contain graphene‐like carbon domains as well as the host material. The technique is demonstrated for molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), tungsten disulfide (WS 2 ), and boron nitride (BN) flakes. Notably, the hybrid nanoparticles are formed in as little as 20 min without toxic or corrosive chemicals and are multifunctional. Photoluminescence and absorption owing to both the carbon domains and host 2D material (MoS 2 , WS 2 , or BN) are observed. This novel hybrid optical behavior makes these materials promising for emerging nanoelectronic and nanophotonic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".