Integration of resin flow and stress development in process modelling of composites: Part II – Transversely isotropic formulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part I of this two-part paper presented the framework to integrate the simulation of resin flow and stress development during the manufacturing process of composites. In the current paper, the integrated approach developed in Part I for isotropic materials is extended to the case of transversely isotropic materials. Various numerical examples are considered in which the results obtained from the integrated approach are compared to those generated from the previously established models for processing induced stress development. These comparisons serve to elucidate the importance of accounting for the spatial and temporal variations in the resin volume fraction during processing and its effect on stress development. Such effects cannot be investigated in a non-integrated simulation environment where volume fraction variations due to resin flow have to be mapped sequentially from the flow simulation onto the next phase of the process simulation which treats the resin as an elastic or viscoelastic solid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it