MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mr. De la Barre’s Expedition, and some Remarkable Transactions in 1684.

2017· book-chapter· en· W2793252433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cadwallader Colden

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the time of peace between the French and the Five Nations, the French built their fort at Teiodondoraghi or Missilimakinak, and made a settlement there. The French took all the precautions in their power, not only to restrain the Indians by force, but also to gain their affections by sending missionaries among them. The only obstacle they met was from the Five Nations, who introduced the English of New-York into the Lakes to trade with the Indians that lived around them. This made the French uneasy because they saw the English as dangerous rivals. The Sennekas lived next to the Lakes, and nearest to the Nations with whom the French traded. They were so averse to the French that they allied themselves with the English. This chapter details events following Mr. De la Barre's (the Governor of Canada) message to Coll. Dongan, citing the need to bring the Five Nations to reason by force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooksSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207