The founder of the Canadian Association of Physicians with Disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A shok Muzumdar, a semiretired specialist in rehabilitation medicine, has been gradually losing his vision over the past 20 years. Now he can see only outlines and can't appreciate detail. He founded the Canadian Association of Physicians with Disabilities (CAPD) in August 2000, and, at that time, it was the first association of its kind in the world to represent disabled doctors. The CAPD now has 72 members across Canada, with different physical and mental disabilities, and it is an affiliated society of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA). After graduating from the University of Indore, India, in 1964, Ashok moved to England to train before finally settling in Canada. In 1985 he became the director and head of the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. I had called a [telephone] number a couple of times but was told that it was out of service. When I asked my secretary to call, I was surprised that she was able to get through. I then realised that I had read …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".