MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793284411 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.277

A276 INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF TTC7A THROUGH ITS INTERACTION WITH UBR5 TO MAINTAIN CELL SURVIVAL

2018· article· en· W2793284411 on OpenAlexaff
Neel Dhingani, Changlong Guo, Neil Warner, Ryan Murchie, Aleixo M. Muise

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyUbiquitin ligaseWnt signaling pathwayHEK 293 cellsCell growthHippo signaling pathwayPhosphatidylinositolCell cycleScaffold proteinSignal transductionCellUbiquitinGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with mutations in Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain 7A (TTC7A) results in a severe and untreatable form of inflammatory bowel disease with the majority dying before 2 years of age. Pathological features of these patients include intestinal apoptosis and disrupted apicobasal polarity. Since the molecular function of TTC7A is still poorly understood, we recently carried out a screen identifying potential TTC7A binding partners in an attempt to reveal its pathway of action. TTC7A is part of an evolutionarily conserved pathway and acts as a scaffolding protein recruiting phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, PI4KIIIα, to the plasma membrane where it also binds to EFR3B. This conserved pathway helps PI4KIIIα phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol (PI) to PI-4-phosphate (PI4P) which has been implicated in cell survival and the maintenance of cell polarity. In addition, the E3 ubiquitin ligase, UBR5, was identified as a potential TTC7A binding protein and may play a role in stabilizing TTC7A protein levels. Furthermore, UBR5 is suggested to be a colorectal oncogene because it interacts with β-catenin to upregulate canonical Wnt signaling. UBR5 has also been implicated as a tumour suppressor gene and in regulating apoptosis. To understand the role of TTC7A and UBR5 in cell survival. We hypothesize that UBR5 is involved and required in the PI4KIIIα-TTC7A-EFR3B pathway to maintain cell survival. Vector constructs were created harbouring patient derived TTC7A mutations (E71K, Q526X, A832T) and expressed in HEK 293T cells. TTC7A immunoprecipitates (IP) were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry identifying various binding proteins. To validate these potential TTC7A interacting proteins, co-IP was performed by co-transfecting cells with appropriate expression plasmids and then lysing the cells after 24hrs. Protein of interest was IP using the target antibody. Whole cell lysate and co-IP samples were subject to Western blot analysis. Preliminary results show an interaction between the UBR5 and TTC7A along with the patient derived TTC7A variants. They also show the presence of PI4KIIIα in the UBR5/TTC7A complex. Furthermore, they suggest that β-catenin only interacts with UBR5 in the presence of TTC7A. The presence of PI4KIIIα in the UBR5/TTC7A complex implies that UBR5 is part of the conserved pathway to maintain cell survival through the downstream PI4P levels. Western blot analysis shows that UBR5 interacts most strongly with the TTC7A Q526X. A possible explanation is that the truncated TTC7A Q526X is ubiquitinated by UBR5 for proteasomal degradation, resulting in decreased PI4P levels. Also, the study suggests that TTC7A recruits β-catenin for ubiquitination by UBR5. Together, the research supports the notion that TTC7A is involved in multiple pathways with UBR5 to maintain cell survival or in causing colorectal cancer. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research→French-language works237,207→