Soft Tissue Structures Differ in Patients With Prearthritic Hip Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinically, understanding how the soft tissue envelope adapts to various forms of hip dysfunction could enhance both surgical and nonsurgical management. Very few studies have looked at soft tissue structures as preoperative discriminators between varying underlying etiologies of hip conditions. PURPOSE: To demonstrate that the magnetic resonance arthrography assessment of soft tissue structures of the hip will preoperatively differ in patients with different underlying hip joint diseases. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography and corrective hip surgery were retrospectively identified yielding 3 groups: 17 with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) (11 F, 6 M; mean age 35.1 years, range 19.6-53.6); 20 with isolated labral tears (LTs) (17 F, 3 M; mean age 38.4 years, range 15.2-62.1), and 20 with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (11 F, 9 M; mean age 38.8 years, range 18.9-51.2). Measurements of the hip labral length, capsule thickness, and psoas, rectus femoris, and gluteal muscle dimensions were performed, with normalization of the values for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The superior labral length was significantly greater in the DDH group [normalized value (NV): 0.30] compared with the FAI group (NV: 0.25, P < 0.05). In addition, the superior (12 o'clock) capsular thickness (NV: 0.24) was significantly greater compared with the LT group (NV: 0.15, P < 0.05) and the FAI group (NV: 0.16, P < 0.05). The DDH group also had a significantly greater anterior (3 o'clock) capsular thickness (NV: 0.18) compared with the LT group (NV: 0.13, P < 0.05). The transverse dimension of the rectus femoris was larger in the DDH group (NV: 1.39) compared with the FAI group (NV: 1.14, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An enlarged rectus femoris and thicker hip capsule as well as an enlarged labrum are characteristic findings in hip dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".