MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793288788 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.035504

Recoil ions from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math> decay of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Sb</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>134</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> confined in a Paul trap

2018· article· lv· W2793288788 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Siegl, N. D. Scielzo, A. Czeszumska, J. A. Clark, G. Savard, A. Aprahamian, S. Caldwell, B. Alan, M. T. Burkey, C. J. Chiara, J. P. Greene, J. Harker, S. T. Marley, G. Morgan, J. Munson, E. B. Norman, R. Orford, S. Padgett, A. Pérez Galván, K. S. Sharma, S. Strauss

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Notre DameNational Nuclear Security AdministrationNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNuclear Energy University ProgramUniversity of CaliforniaNorthwestern UniversityU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsIonRecoilExcited stateDecay schemeGround stateBranching fractionCharge (physics)Beta decayAlpha decayNuclear physicsGamma rayParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low-energy recoiling ions from the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay of $^{134}\mathrm{Sb}$ were studied by using the Beta-decay Paul Trap. Using this apparatus, singly charged ions were suspended in vacuum at the center of a detector array used to detect emitted $\ensuremath{\beta}$ particles, $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays, and recoil ions in coincidence. The recoil ions emerge from the trap with negligible scattering, allowing $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay properties and the charge-state distribution of the daughter ions to be determined from the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-ion coincidences. First-forbidden $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay theory predicts a $\ensuremath{\beta}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\nu}$ correlation coefficient of nearly unity for the ${0}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ to ${0}^{+}$ transition from the ground state of $^{134}\mathrm{Sb}$ to the ground state of $^{134}\mathrm{Te}$. Although this transition was expected to have a nearly 100% branching ratio, an additional 17.2(52)% of the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay strength must populate high-lying excited states to obtain an angular correlation consistent with unity. The extracted charge-state distribution of the recoiling ions was compared with existing $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay results and the average charge state was found to be consistent with the results from lighter nuclei.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207