MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793309295 · doi:10.4000/communication.7622

Penser politiquement la communication publique

2018· article· fr· W2793309295 on OpenAlexaffvenue
François Demers, Julien Rueff

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le syntagme « communication publique » désigne un domaine d’études s’intéressant aux manifestations multiples et variables de la parole publique. Le présent article examine plusieurs présupposés partagés par les recherches en communication publique, dans l’idée d’évaluer leur adéquation avec l’intention de donner une intelligibilité politique à ces phénomènes communicationnels. À la lumière de la pensée politique d’Antonio Gramsci, les auteurs analysent dans quelle mesure ces présupposés permettent de penser la compénétration des modalités coercitive et discursive du pouvoir politique, les antagonismes irréductibles et indécidables entre les groupes sociaux, mais aussi les articulations entre la société civile et la société politique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207