MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793326902 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.018

A18 DIETARY ANTIGEN RE-CHALLENGE INCREASES NOCICEPTIVE NEURON EXCITABILITY IN A POST-INFECTIOUS IBS MODEL.

2018· article· en· W2793326902 on OpenAlexaff
Cintya D. Lopez Lopez, Josue O. Jaramillo Polanco, Javier Lizarraga, S Vanner, David E. Reed, Guy E. Boeckxstaens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheobasePyrilamineNociceptionIrritable bowel syndromeOvalbuminMedicineHistamineImmunologyVisceral painPharmacologyInternal medicineReceptorAntigenAntagonistStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infectious gastroenteritis is a risk factor for development of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Exposure to the dietary antigen ovalbumin (OVA) during infection with Citrobacter rodentium resulted in an increased visceromotor response to colonic distension and increased mucosal permeability following re-challenge with OVA. It is unknown whether colonic immune mediators released following re-challenge of OVA could subsequently increase the excitability of nociceptive neurons. Determine whether colonic mediators released in response to dietary antigen re-challenge increase excitability of nociceptive neurons and whether the histamine receptor H1 is involved in a model of post infectious IBS. Mice were infected with C. rodentium in the presence (infected OVA/OVA) or absence of OVA (infected saline/OVA) and were subsequently re-challenged with OVA 5 weeks post-infection. A third group of mice were not infected but exposed to OVA and re-challenged with OVA at 5 weeks (non-infected OVA/OVA). Following OVA re-challenge, mice were euthanized and the colons were incubated in media, supernatants were collected after 4 hrs. Supernatants were incubated overnight with nociceptive DRG neurons from control mice. Perforated patch clamp recordings were employed to assess neuronal excitability by measuring rheobase (minimum current to evoke an action potential) and action potential discharge (AP) at twice rheobase. Some DRG neurons were also pre-incubated with the H1 receptor antagonist pyrilamine (1µM) 1 hour prior to incubation with supernatants. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data. Infected OVA/OVA supernatants decreased the rheobase compared to the other two groups (Infected OVA/OVA= 68 ± 4.2 pA* vs Non-infected OVA/OVA= 81.2 ± 4 pA vs Infected saline/OVA = 85.6 ± 4.5 pA; *p<0.05, n= 17–19). Similarly, infected OVA/OVA supernatant also increased action potential discharge at twice rheobase (1.7 ± 0.2* vs 1.2 ± 0.1 vs 1.2 ± 0.1; *p<0.05, n= 17–19). Pyrilamine reversed the effect of infected OVA/OVA supernatant on DRG neurons (rheobase= 88.8 ± 5.5 pA, p < 0.01; AP= 1.3 ± 0.1, p= NS, n= 16) but had no effect on supernatants from the other two groups. Colonic supernatants following re-challenge with OVA increased excitability of DRG nociceptive neurons only in mice first exposed to OVA at the time of a gastrointestinal infection and this effect was inhibited by an H1 antagonist. This suggests that exposure to a dietary antigen at the time of gastrointestinal infection may prime the immune system such that re-exposure to the antigen induces release of immune mediators (e.g. histamine) resulting in increased pain signalling. CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→