MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793371560 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2017-0662

<i>spd1672</i>, a novel in vivo-induced gene, affects inflammatory response in a murine model of <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> infection

2018· article· en· W2793371560 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lingling Gan, Xuemei Zhang, Xiuyu Xu, Wenchun Xu, Chang Lu, Jin Cui, Hong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProinflammatory cytokineIn vivoStreptococcus pneumoniaeBiologyMicrobiologyMutantGene expressionImmune systemTumor necrosis factor alphaImmunologyGeneInflammationGeneticsAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

spd1672, a novel Streptococcus pneumoniae (hereinafter S. pn) gene induced in vivo, has been identified to contribute to the virulence of S. pn; however, the role of spd1672 during host innate immune reaction against S. pn infection is unknown. In the present study, mice were infected with wild-type D39 and mutant D39Δspd1672 strains. Compared with the D39-infected mice, reduced bacterial load and attenuated inflammatory response were observed in the D39Δspd1672-treated mice. The levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β, in the blood of D39Δspd1672-infected mice were lower than that in the D39-infected group. Additionally, attenuated activation of STAT3 and AKT was observed in the D39Δspd1672-infected mice. In conclusion, our data indicated that spd1672 expression modulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines, and AKT-STAT3 signaling appears to participate in the process. In conclusion, the present study extends our understanding of the role of an in vivo-induced gene in S. pn-host interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→French-language works237,207→