MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793383967 · doi:10.1101/253377

Taxonomic identification from metagenomic and metabarcoding data using any genetic marker

2018· preprint· en· W2793383967 on OpenAlexaff
Johan Bengtsson‐Palme, Rodney T. Richardson, Marco Meola, Christian Wurzbacher, Emilie Tremblay, Kaisa Thorell, Kärt Kanger, K. Martin Eriksson, Guillaume J. Bilodeau, Reed M. Johnson, Martin Hartmann, R. Henrik Nilsson

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
FundersVetenskapsrådetSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasProject Apis m.
KeywordsMetagenomicsBiologyIdentification (biology)AmpliconComputational biologyTaxonomic rankBiodiversityGenetic diversityBiological classificationDNA sequencingGenetic markerShotgun sequencingEvolutionary biologyGeneticsEcologyDNAGenePolymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correct taxonomic identification of DNA sequences is central to studies of biodiversity using both shotgun metagenomic and metabarcoding approaches. However, there is no genetic marker that gives sufficient performance across all the biological kingdoms, hampering studies of taxonomic diversity in many groups of organisms. We here present a major update to Metaxa2 ( http://microbiology.se/software/metaxa2/ ) that enables the use of any genetic marker for taxonomic classification of metagenome and amplicon sequence data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207