MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793471889 · doi:10.7202/1042744ar

Le salut comme réconciliation

2017· article· fr· W2793471889 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConciliationHumanitiesPhilosophyConscienceEthnologyPolitical scienceSociologyMediationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article traite de notre réconciliation avec les Premières Nations du Canada. Nous nous situons là du côté de l’offensant face à l’offensé. Une première partie se réfère donc à Karl Jaspers dans son opuscule sur La culpabilité allemande, où il montre comment l’ouverture de la conscience à la culpabilité amorce un processus de purification et de réconciliation. D’un point de vue théologique, il en va de même chez Paul Tillich, où la conscience de l’aliénation conduit à la réconciliation avec Dieu dans le Christ. Ce qu’on trouve, chez saint Paul, appliqué à la réconciliation des deux peuples, les Juifs et les Grecs. Dans une troisième partie, l’article fait voir comment le conflit entre « Blancs » et « Amérindiens » consiste dans la polarité entre l’enracinement communautaire et l’universalisme des Lumières. La réconciliation souhaitée devra donc se faire par l’union de ces deux pôles dans toute existence humaine, communautaire aussi bien que personnelle. Une dernière partie porte sur la polarité et la réconciliation des deux types de religions : religion cosmique et religion de l’alliance avec un Dieu personnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0190.025
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiques→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→