MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793479452 · doi:10.1117/12.2291291

High speed UHR-OCT for in-vivo volumetric imaging of the palisades of Vogt and the cellular structure of the limbal crypts in the healthy and pathological human corneo-scleral limbus (Conference Presentation)

2018· article· en· W2793479452 on OpenAlexaff
Kostadinka Bizheva, Bingyao Tan, Zohreh Hosseinaee, Kirsten Carter, Denise Hileeto, Luigina Sorbara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyOptical imagingGeologyOphthalmologyMedicineOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limbal stem cell dysfunction (LSCD) causes morphological and physiological changes in the limbus that result in decreased vision, photophobia, tearing, chronic inflammation and hyperemia, recurrent episodes of pain, and blindness in severe cases. Currently, clinical in-vivo imaging of the palisaded of Vogt (POV) and the cellular structure of the limbal crypts in the human corneo-scleral limbus is accomplished by in-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). However, IVCM requires physical contact with the limbal tissue that can cause pain and inflammation. In this study, we used a novel high speed, ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) system to generate volumetric, cellular resolution image of the healthy and pathological human corneo-scleral limbus. The UHR-OCT system has a compact fiber-optic design. A femtosecond laser with 790 nm central wavelength and ~150 nm spectral bandwidth (at 3dB) was used to achieve ~1.4 µm axial resolution in biological tissue. The UHR-OCT system also utilizes a high resolution spectrometer (Cobra, Wasatch Photonics) connected to a novel line scan camera with a tall pixel design, 2048 pixel array and a maximum readout rate of 250 kHz. The system’s SNR was 96 dB at 100 µm away from the zero delay line, with ~10 dB roll-off over 1.5 mm scanning range for ~800 µm power of the imaging beam. Volumetric images of the POV and the cellular structure of the limbal crypts were acquired in-vivo and without contact with the limbal tissue from healthy and LSCD and subjects. This study was approved by the University of Waterloo Research Ethics Committee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207