A many-objective Jaya algorithm for many-objective optimization problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proposed work presents the design and application of many-objective Jaya (MaOJaya) algorithm to optimize many-objective benchmark optimization problems. The basic Jaya algorithm is modified by introducing non-dominated sorting and tournament selection scheme of NSGA-II. The reference point mechanism is introduced to traverse algorithm towards the best solutions. The basic Jaya algorithm is modified while preserving its essential properties. The Tchebycheff -a decomposition based approach is used to simplify the complex MaOPs. The proposed MaOJaya algorithm is tested on DTLZ benchmark functions with objectives ranging from three to ten to measure its applicability and effectiveness to solve many-objective optimization problems. The IGD and Hypervolume performance metrics are used to evaluate the performance of proposed MaOJaya algorithm. The obtained IGD and Hypervolume values compared with the best known results and it is observed that, the proposed MaOJaya algorithm gives competitive or better results than known best results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it