MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793510989 · doi:10.1002/adem.201700957

High Performance Triboelectric Nanogenerator by Hot Embossing on Self‐Assembled Micro‐Particles

2018· article· en· W2793510989 on OpenAlexaff
Zia Saadatnia, Ebrahim Esmailzadeh, Hani E. Naguib

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriboelectric effectNanogeneratorMaterials scienceEmbossingNanotechnologyFabricationVoltageOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) is a novel technology for energy harvesting and active sensing which shows a great potential toward extracting the ambient kinetic energy. The surface morphology of triboelectric layers is one of the most important elements for enhancing the output of TENG devices. Current surface modification methods mostly require complicated, long term, size limited, and costly processes. This paper presents a cost effective, facile, repeatable, and fast method for large scale surface modification of triboelectric layers which significantly enhance the performance of TENG devices. This method simply utilizes the hot‐embossing of polymers on self‐assembled micro‐particles to create semi‐ordered micro‐sized structures on the surfaces. The modified surfaces increase the output performance of the TENG such as open circuit voltage and short circuit current for more than four times. As the presence of water degrades the output of TENG, this technique is very beneficial to remarkably improve the hydrophobicity of the contact layers. The proposed method can be applied to a variety of polymers with an area scalable fabrication toward the use of TENG in real world industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Engineering MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207