MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793520199 · doi:10.2118/189729-ms

Measurement of Non-Equilibrium Solvent Release from Heavy Oil during Pressure Depletion

2018· article· en· W2793520199 on OpenAlexaff
J. Bryan, Jessica Butron, Erik Nickel, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolventViscosityChemistryMethaneEnhanced oil recoveryAqueous solutionLight crude oilChemical engineeringMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cyclic solvent injection (CSI) is a promising technology for enhanced production of heavy oil in post-CHOPS (Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand) fields. The first stage of a CSI cycle involves the injection of solvent vapour, which re-energizes the reservoir and dissolves into oil, reducing its viscosity. The second stage of a CSI cycle involves dropping the pressure to flow the solvent-diluted oil back to the well. This is the solvent analog to cyclic steam stimulation (CSS). A key difference between solvent and steam is that the heat from steam stays in the oil even during production, while in solvent-diluted oil, if solvent comes out of solution as pressure drops, oil viscosity will increase again and one of the main benefits of the solvent will be lost. Solvent selection in CSI needs to consider which solvents have non-equilibrium properties, specifically delayed release during pressure depletion. This study presents a set of low field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests that were run on a 3,370 mPa·s viscosity heavy oil and several solvents: methane-propane and methane-CO2. NMR measures the relaxation rate of protons in the presence of magnetic fields. When fluid viscosity decreases, the fluid signal relaxes more slowly. A properly calibrated NMR model can be used to measure the viscosity of the liquid phase in a solvent-oil mixture as pressure drops and gas leaves solution. This approach does not require flow, and can also be used to measure the in-situ viscosity of oil in the sand. Tests were run using methane-CO2 solvents with varying CO2 concentration to study the impact of live oil viscosity on the rate of solvent release. For lower initial live oil viscosity, the solvent is able to more quickly leave solution from the oil. Additional tests run using a methane-propane solvent demonstrate the impact of varying solvent type for the same initial solution viscosity. Both CO2 and propane show significant non-equilibrium solvent release during depletion. Measurements of non-equilibrium solvent release from oil are an important piece in the understanding and modeling of heavy oil CSI. Equilibrium PVT data shows how different solvents can affect heavy oil systems, but the non-equilibrium solvent release is crucial for these solvents to work as recovery agents in the field. The results presented in this study provide useful data for CO2 and propane as potential CSI solvents, and help in the understanding of the role of viscosity vs. solvent type in the diluted oil response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207