MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793572178

From paper to cyberspace : changing communication technologies and the implications for personal records archivists

2002· article· en· W2793572178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberspaceInternet privacyPublic relationsWorld Wide WebThe InternetBusinessPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our lo Note rlrcnc L'auteur a accord une licence non exclusive permettant la Bibliothque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thse sous la forme de microfiche/fiIn, de reproduction sur paprer ou sur format lectronique.L'auteur conserve la proprit du droit d'auteur qui protge cette thse.Ni la thse ni des extraits substantels de celle-ci ne doivent ne imprims ou autrement reproduits sns son autorisation.Canad' 0-612-80058-X records have always been an important part of the mandate of Canadian public ABSTRACT archives.Researchers and the wider society whch funds these archives will thus rightly expect that archivists in these archives will address the matter of personal electronic records.Chapter Two provides an overview of archival responses to institutional electronic records and archives.This will show that heavy emphasis has been placed on public or government electronic records.While this orientation can provide useful insights for personal records archivists, it does not address all of their concerns.Chapter Three will examine some of the most recent developments in computerized communications technologies people are using when creating personal documents.These technologies pose new challenges for personal records archivists.A short history of personal communications will put this challenge into context.Chapter Four will convey various archival responses to personal electronic records.Some archival institutions (including the Provincial Archives of Manitoba, the University of Manitoba Department of Archives and Special Collections, and the National Archives of Canada) have been surveyed to see how they have responded to personal electronic records and how they plan to do so in future.This thesis aims to raise awareness among archivists and researchers of the implications of personal electronic records for archives.This is an important, yet largely understudied, aspect of archives.lt is hoped that this study will further examination of this key problem by archivists and others alike.I would like to thank the University of Manitoba for offering the Archival Studies Program.This unique area of study provides students with an historical background, archival theory and practical skill unlike any other program in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it