MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793575003 · doi:10.2118/189755-ms

Azeotropic Heated Vapour Extraction- A New Thermal-Solvent Assisted Gravity Drainage Recovery Process

2018· article· en· W2793575003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolventPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryProcess engineeringSteam injectionSteam-assisted gravity drainageDilutionExtraction (chemistry)Materials scienceThermal energyProcess (computing)Environmental scienceChemistryThermodynamicsAsphaltOil sandsChromatographyComputer scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thermal-Solvent Assisted Gravity Drainage processes are heavy oil recovery processes in which the stimulation mechanism for bitumen viscosity reduction is by heating and dilution. The range of the injected solvent concentration with steam may be low such as in Solvent Assisted-SAGD or very high such as in Heated Vapour Extraction. The performance behaviour of these processes is significantly driven by the complex thermodynamic interaction of steam and solvent, heat transfer, multiphase fluid equilibrium and flow in the porous medium. ExxonMobil and its affiliate Imperial have been optimizing the existing recovery processes and developing new technologies to improve the efficiencies and environmental performance of the heavy oil production operations. Recent focus has been on developing thermal-solvent based recovery processes through an integrated research program that includes fundamental laboratory work, advanced numerical simulation studies, laboratory scaled physical modeling, and field piloting. The research program aims at in-depth investigation and understanding of process physics and mechanisms, and evaluating process performance and behaviour to enable development of new recovery methods and to enhance the performance. This paper focuses on the fundamental concepts of Azeotropic Heated Vapour Extraction, a new thermal solvent recovery technology developed by ExxonMobil-Imperial. This technology takes the combined advantages of the solvent dilution mechanism for enhanced oil production rate with the minimum required energy (GHG emission), as well as the effectiveness of energy transport of steam to minimize the required solvent in circulation for the extraction process. In this paper, the complex solvent-steam phase behaviour and reservoir fluid flow and their interaction under operating conditions are investigated. The analysis of experimental and modeling data shows that the injection of solvent-steam mixture at its azeotropic condition results in significant improvement in process key performance indicators (KPI's). At these conditions, the reservoir is heated to the minimum boiling temperature of the solvent-steam mixture compared to a Heated VAPEX or Solvent Assisted-SAGD process resulting in the reduction of the required energy thereby minimizing the solvent-to-oil ratio. Also, due to phase equilibrium, the vaporization of in-situ water is prevented resulting in the reduction of retained solvent in the depleted zone of the reservoir. It is found that an improvement in the process KPI's is dependent on the volatility of the selected solvent. The process KPI's also vary with operational conditions. The recovery process is optimized for certain reservoir constraints through the selection of the solvent boiling range and consequently the azeotropic steam content in the injected mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it