MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793601663 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.199

A199 EFFICACY OF TOFACITINIB RETREATMENT FOR ULCERATIVE COLITIS AFTER TREATMENT INTERRUPTION: RESULTS FROM THE OCTAVE CLINICAL TRIALS

2018· article· en· W2793601663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTofacitinibOctave (electronics)Ulcerative colitisClinical endpointClinical trialPlaceboInternal medicineSurgeryRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor that is being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). It is not expected to elicit formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies that may limit successful retreatment after treatment interruption. To evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib retreatment following treatment interruption in patients (pts) with UC participating in an ongoing Phase 3, open-label, long-term extension (LTE) study (OCTAVE Open, NCT01470612; data as of July 2016). The OCTAVE clinical trial program included induction (OCTAVE Induction 1 & 2),1 maintenance (OCTAVE Sustain)1 and LTE (OCTAVE Open) studies. OCTAVE Open included non-responders from OCTAVE Induction 1 & 2 and pts who completed or experienced treatment failure in OCTAVE Sustain. This analysis included the subpopulation of pts in OCTAVE Open who achieved clinical response (≥3-point and 30% reduction from induction baseline total Mayo score plus decrease ≥1 point in rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] or absolute RBS ≤1) following 8 weeks (wks) of induction therapy with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID), entered OCTAVE Sustain and experienced treatment failure while receiving placebo for up to 52 weeks and subsequently entered OCTAVE Open and received tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Treatment failure was defined by increase ≥3 points from maintenance study baseline total Mayo score plus increase in both RBS and endoscopic subscore (ES) ≥1 point; ≥8 wks of maintenance therapy. We evaluated rates of clinical response, mucosal healing (ES ≤1) and remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no individual subscore >1 and RBS=0) at Months (M) 2 and 12 of the LTE study using non-responder imputation (NRI). Of 914 pts enrolled in OCTAVE Open and treated for ≥2 M at data cut-off, 101 entered OCTAVE Open with clinical response to tofacitinib 10 mg BID in OCTAVE Induction 1 or 2 and treatment failure with PBO during OCTAVE Sustain. Clinical response, mucosal healing and remission rates were, respectively, 75.8%, 55.4% and 40.4% at M2, and 67.5%, 53.6% and 43.4% at M12 (Table). For pts who responded to induction therapy with tofacitinib 10 mg BID and subsequently experienced treatment failure while receiving PBO maintenance therapy, efficacy responses were recaptured by a majority of pts by M2 and generally sustained at M12 after reinitiating tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Safety data were not presented for the retreatment subpopulation, limiting assessment of whether tofacitinib can be re-introduced safely in these pts. 1. Sandborn WJ et al. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1723–36. Pfizer Inc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it