LE TRADUCTEUR FICTIF DE JACQUES POULIN OU L’INVENTION D’UN MYTHE LITTÉRAIRE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jacques Poulin’s Fictional Translator or the Invention of a Literary Myth. The present paper attempts to explore the reasons of a literary success: the fictional translator in 21st century Francophone fiction. Are we to place such success in the sociological and economical changes occurred in the late 1990s within the context of globalization and of the (re)invention of new professional identities? The starting point of our analysis will be a recent novel published by Jacques Poulin, La traduction est une histoire d’amour (2006), which will permit us to link the narrative success of the translator to sociological reflections on the Quebec territory challenged by a bilingual consciousness. REZUMAT. Traducătorul fictiv al lui Jacques Poulin sau Inventarea unui mit literar. Lucrarea de față își propune să examineze rațiunile unui succes literar: figura traducărului fictiv în literaturile francofone contemporane. Putem oare înțelege acest succes prin prisma schimbărilor societale și economice petrecute începând cu ultima decadă a secolului trecut, în contextul globalizării și al (re)inventării unor noi identități profesionale ? Punctul de plecare al analizei îl va constitui un roman publicat recent de către scriitorul canadian de limbă franceză, Jacques Poulin, La traduction est une histoire d’amour (2006), care creează o punte de legătură între succesul narativ actual al traducătorului-personaj și reflecții de natură sociologică, legate de statutul bilingv al Quebecului. Cuvinte-cheie: mit literar, traducător fictiv, traducere literară, Jacques Poulin, Quebec, comunitate bilingvă, literaturi francofone contemporane
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".