Systems analysis of the genetic interaction network of yeast molecular chaperones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular chaperones are typically promiscuous interacting proteins that function globally in the cell to maintain protein homeostasis. Recently, we had carried out experiments that elucidated a comprehensive interaction network for the core 67 chaperones and 15 cochaperones in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [Rizzolo et al., Cell Rep., 2017, 20, 2735-2748]. Here, the genetic (i.e. epistatic) interaction network obtained for chaperones was further analyzed, revealing that the global topological parameters of the resulting network have a more central role in mediating interactions in comparison to the rest of the proteins in the cell. Most notably, we observed Hsp10, Hsp70 Ssz1 chaperone, and Hsp90 cochaperone Cdc37 to be the main drivers of the network architecture. Systematic analysis on the physicochemical properties for all chaperone interactors further revealed the presence of preferential domains and folds that are highly interactive with chaperones such as the WD40 repeat domain. Further analysis with established cellular complexes revealed the involvement of R2TP chaperone in quaternary structure formation. Our results thus provide a global overview of the chaperone network properties in yeast, expanding our understanding of their functional diversity and their role in protein homeostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".