Self-evaluation of Parental Competence – Differences Between Parents with Pedagogical and Non-Pedagogical Professions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parental competence is closely related to various factors, which can directly or indirectly influence parentalbehaviour. One of these factors is the level of education, and more recent research show that the parents' choice ofprofession can be favourable for the development of certain parental skills and experience of parental competence.The aim of this research was to determine if there is a difference in the sense of parental competence among parentsof pedagogical professions. Research was conducted on a sample of 544 parents of pedagogical (N=247) andnon-pedagogical professions (N=297). The results show that parents of pedagogical professions (kindergarten andelementary school teachers), more so than parents of other professions, estimate their parental Efficacy as better, butthat is not the case with Satisfaction. This result can serve as confirmation to previous research about the positiveconnection between pedagogical and parental competence, and can contribute to understanding the connection ofsome pedagogical skills and abilities necessary for the development of parental competence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".