MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793693480 · doi:10.1177/0309324718755926

Investigation on the deformation and microstructure evolution of P91 steel in short-term small punch creep test

2018· article· en· W2793693480 on OpenAlexaff
Kaishu Guan, Jerzy A. Szpunar, Wen Ming Cheng, Xu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)MicrostructureShear (geology)MetallurgyFracture (geology)Texture (cosmology)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small punch creep test is a semi-destructive method which can be used for creep determination and assessment of the probability of failure. The deformation during this small punch creep test is very complicated because the accumulation of both plastic and creep deformation will lead to the failure. In order to understand the mechanism of small punch creep test from grain orientation changes during creep and fracture process, small punch creep test was carried out using P91 steel under a 500 N load at 600 °C in this study. Finite element method was used to simulate the mechanical deformation process. Electron back-scattered diffraction technique and texture analysis were used to analyze the microstructure of the small punch creep deformation and rupture. The results showed that the grain orientation evolves from the rather random orientation in the first stage to the<110>//ND texture in the tertiary stage which caused mainly by shear strain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering DesignSame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207