MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793706941 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.12276

Chloroquine-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Reversible Cause of Heart Failure

2018· article· en· W2793706941 on OpenAlexafffund
Haran Yogasundaram, Whitney Hung, D. Ian Paterson, Consolato Sergi, Gavin Y. Oudit

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureCardiomyopathyCardiologyInternal medicineHydroxychloroquineHeart diseaseHypertrophic cardiomyopathyChloroquineDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are anti-rheumatic medications frequently used in the treatment of connective tissue disorders. We present the case of a 45-year-old woman with CQ-induced cardiomyopathy leading to severe heart failure. Electrocardiographic abnormalities included bifascicular block, while structural disease consisted of severe biventricular and biatrial hypertrophy. Appropriate diagnosis via endomyocardial biopsy led to cessation of CQ and subsequent dramatic improvement in symptoms and structural heart disease. Cardiac toxicity is an under-recognized adverse effect of CQ/HCQ leading to cardiomyopathy with concentric hypertrophy and conduction abnormalities, with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. Predisposing factors for CQ/HCQ-induced cardiomyopathy have been proposed. CQ/HCQ cardiomyopathy is a phenocopy of Fabry disease, and α-galactosidase A polymorphism may account for some heterogeneity of disease presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityFrench-language works237,207