MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793716330 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.152

A151 MEDICATION INDUCED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN A PATIENT WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2018· article· en· W2793716330 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Dong, Levinus A. Dieleman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabUlcerative colitisAzathioprineInternal medicinePrednisoneInterstitial lung diseaseMesalazineGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseLevofloxacinPulmonary function testingSurgerySulfasalazineLungDiseaseAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-infectious pulmonary complications in ulcerative colitis (UC) are rare and can be an extra-intestinal manifestation or a consequence of medications. Medications known to cause pulmonary complications include mesalamine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, azathioprine, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. We present a case of interstitial lung disease development in a patient with UC who was treated with mesalamine and infliximab. A 43 year old previously healthy male was diagnosed with UC in February. He was started on mesalamine at a dose of 4 grams a day as well as infliximab 5 mg/kg induction and maintenance every 8 weeks. In April, he reported abdominal symptoms and was found to have low infliximab levels. He was given another 5 mg/kg induction dose and his maintenance interval changed to every 4 weeks. He then presented to hospital in August with increasing shortness of breath and pleuritic chest pain. CT scan revealed ground-glass opacities in both lungs, particularly in the upper lobes. Infectious workup including a bronchoscopy was negative. However, he was treated empirically with a 5 day course of levofloxacin but did not return to baseline. At the time of discharge, pulmonary function testing (PFT) revealed a TLC of 44% and a DLCO of 50%. This patient was diagnosed with interstitial lung process. Mesalamine and infliximab were stopped as possible causative agents. A few weeks later this patient presented with a UC flare requiring IV steroids and prednisone taper. His bowel symptoms improved as did his respiratory symptoms. Follow up PFT at the end of September showed an improved TLC of 73% and DLCO of 83%. UC has various extra-intestinal manifestations including uveitis, arthritis, and rarely pulmonary disease. Besides complications of the disease itself, mesalamine and infliximab can both induce interstitial lung disease. Literature review has revealed mesalamine-induced lung toxicity to be rare, presenting as interstitial lung disease, alveolitis, eosinophilic pneumonia, or bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia usually 2–6 months after medication start. Cases of infliximab-induced lung disease have also been reported mainly in the rheumatoid arthritis population presenting as an interstitial lung disease. The onset of toxicity is quite variable, usually after the 2nd and 5th infusions. Possible mechanisms include increased pro-inflammatory cytokines with inhibition of TNF-α and release of proteolytic enzymes upon interaction of infliximab with T-cells and macrophages. In both mesalamine and infliximab-induced pulmonary toxicity, steroid therapy results in clinical improvement. In our patient, pulmonary toxicity can be due to mesalamine, infliximab, or a combination of both. This is the first case of interstitial lung disease as a drug-induced toxicity in a UC patient on both mesalamine and infliximab. Ground-glass opacities in the upper lobes of both lungs None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatmentFrench-language works237,207