MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793717219 · doi:10.1002/mp.12756

Monte Carlo analysis of beam blocking grid design parameters: Scatter estimation and the importance of electron backscatter

2018· article· en· W2793717219 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory Bootsma, Lei Ren, Hong Zhang, Jian‐Yue Jin, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodImaging phantomBackscatter (email)OpticsGridBeam (structure)SIGNAL (programming language)Blocking (statistics)Cone beam computed tomographyPhysicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Beam blocking grids provide a simple and direct measurement of the scattered photon signal which degrades image quality in x-ray imaging systems, such as cone-beam CT (CBCT). This study evaluates the scatter estimation accuracy of the beam blocking method to optimize the design parameters of the grid system (e.g., grid thickness, source-to-grid distance (SGD), septa width, air interspace, and grid ratio) using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. METHOD: A MC model of a CBCT imaging system with a beam blocking grid in place is made using code based on EGSnrc, with the x-ray tube portion of the simulation including electron backscatter between the anode and cathode. The inclusion of the electron backscatter allowed a more complete model of the contamination signal to be estimated. The contamination signal consists of the off-focal radiation (OFR) and source component scatter (photon scatter in source components such as tube housing, filters, and collimators). The MC model was validated against measurements collected on a bench top imaging system with a grid in place. The MC model was used to simulate 11 different grid design configurations in addition to a case with no grid. For each design a simulated projection with and without a phantom in place was computed. The simulated projections were then used to estimate the scatter and contamination portion of the signal using the signal behind the grid septa. The estimated signals from the grid data were compared to the actual signals labeled during the MC simulation. RESULTS: Simulated results showed good agreeance with measured results with the importance of including electron backscatter resulting in off-focal radiation in the simulation being highlighted. When the source was free of contamination photons all grids performed with an error less than 8% when estimating just the scatter from the object. When the contamination photons were included in the simulation, the error in estimating both the scatter and contamination signal rose by a factor of 4 on average. In the case when both signals are present, increasing the grid thickness, changing the SGD, and reducing septa width and air interspace sizes all showed the ability to improve the grid-based estimates of the object scatter and contamination portion signal. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of the contamination signal in MC simulations of x-ray imaging systems is important in the design, validation, and evaluation of measurement-based scatter methods. Beam blocking grids show potential not only in object scatter estimation but in the estimation of the contamination signal, but appropriate interpolation functions must be used to account for higher frequencies found in contamination signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207