MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793722726 · doi:10.1134/s207004661801003x

On Integrable Delta Functions on the Levi-Civita Field

2018· article· en· W2793722726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueP-Adic Numbers Ultrametric Analysis and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrable systemDirac delta functionLebesgue integrationContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)MathematicsDirac (video compression format)Measure (data warehouse)DeltaLebesgue measurePure mathematicsField theory (psychology)Mathematical analysisMathematical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a theory of integrable delta functions on the Levi-Civita field R as well as on R 2 and R 3 with similar properties to the one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional Dirac Delta functions and which reduce to them when restricted to points in R, R 2 and R 3 , respectively. First we review the recently developed Lebesgue-like measure and integration theory over R, R 2 and R 3 . Then we introduce delta functions on R, R 2 and R 3 that are integrable in the context of the aforementioned integration theory; and we study their properties and some applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it