MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A genomic classifier for identifying a neuroendocrine-like bladder cancer subtype.

2018· article· en· W2793733549 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan L. Wright, Marc Dall’Era, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Roland Seiler, Yang Liu, Ewan A. Gibb, Natalie Qiqi Wang, Nicholas Erho, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Elai Davicioni, Jason A. Efstathiou, James G. Douglas, Joost L. Boormans, Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden, Yair Lotan, Peter C. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaGenome British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerInternal medicineTranscriptomeOncologyCarcinomaSubtypingCystectomyCancerPathologyGeneGene expressionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

440 Background: Neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma is a rare and aggressive variant of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Molecular subtyping studies found 5-15% of bladder tumors had transcriptome profiles consistent with NE carcinoma but lacked NE histology (Robertson 2017, Sjödahl 2017). Identifying NE variants may have prognostic implications and modify treatment recommendations. In this study, we present a robust genomic classifier trained to identify NE carcinoma. Methods: Transcriptome-wide expression profiles were generated for 576 MIBC patients collected from seven institutions. Model training included profiles generated from TURBT and RC specimens from 320 patients prior to treatment with NAC or chemo-radiation. The validation cohort consisted of 256 RC specimens (no prior systemic treatment). Using 10 MIBC-related gene sets, a GLMNET model was built to predict patients with a NE carcinoma expression profile. Uni- and multi-variable survival analyses were used to characterize outcomes of the predicted NE tumors. Results: In the training set, hierarchical clustering using a panel of 54 genes showed a cluster of 17 patients (5.3%) with a NE carcinoma expression profile. These patients had significantly worse 1 year progression free survival (65% vs 82% for NE vs overall; p = 0.046). In the validation set, 7 tumors were classified (2.7%) as NE with 4 (57%) patients dying from the disease at 1 year after RC. Within 3 years of RC, 100% (7/7) of patients with NE tumors had died. After adjusting for various clinical and pathological factors, patients with predicted NE tumors had a 6.40 increased risk of all-cause mortality (p = 0.001). Conclusions: We have developed a gene expression signature that predicts a particularly high-risk group that may need treatment intensification, alternative chemotherapy or clinical trials. Validation will be required to assess the potential clinical utility of this NE carcinoma classifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances→French-language works237,207→