MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Macarius of Sinai’s Treatise “On Fasting during Cheesefare Week”

2017· article· en· W2793783411 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Treiger

Bibliographic record

VenueSt Tikhons University Review Series III Philology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article off ers an analysis and a Russian translation of Macarius of Sinai’s (archbishop, from before 1230–1252) unpublished Arabic treatise “On Fasting during Cheesefare Week”. In this treatise, Macarius of Sinai responds to a query by an Arabic-speaking Orthodox Christian, probably a layman from Egypt, about the order of fasting during Cheesefare Week — the last week before the Great Lent. According to Macarius, during Cheesefare Week eating cheese and eggs is mandatory for both monastics and laymen. Strict fasting during this week (i. e., abstention not only from meat, but from all animal products) is observed only by heretics, notably the Egyptian Christian Monophysites (the Copts). Macarius’ treatise also contains a brief history of the “Fast of Heraclius” — i. e., a strict fast on the last week before the Great Lent — and of the Armenian fast “Artsivourios” (Arm. Aṙačʿavorkʿ), observed during the week of the Publican and the Pharisee. Macarius refers to a wide variety of Patristic and Church-canonical sources with which he was familiar both in their Greek original and in medieval Arabic translations. Among the sources cited by him are Antiochus of MarSaba’s Pandectes, Nikon of the Black Mountain’s Pandectes, and the “Synodic for the Sunday of Orthodoxy”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSt Tikhons University Review Series III PhilologySame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207