MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793828056 · doi:10.22323/1.120.0432

Recent Results From VERITAS

2011· article· en· W2793828056 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Hanna

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 35th International Conference of High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP 2010) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsAstronomyGalaxyCherenkov radiationPulsarCherenkov Telescope ArrayAstrophysicsGamma-ray astronomySupernovaTelescopeGamma rayDetectorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VERITAS (Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System) is an array of four 12metre atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes located near Tucson, Arizona, USA.It is sensitive to astrophysical gamma rays at energies above 100 GeV.Since becoming fully operational in September 2007, VERITAS has detected a variety of sources, including active galactic nuclei, pulsar wind nebulae, and supernova remnants.Gamma rays have also been observed from a starburst galaxy, a radio galaxy and an X-ray binary system.Searches for dark-matter annihilation and black-hole evaporation are a continuing part of the science program.This presentation will highlight recent results from VERITAS and outline plans for future upgrades and further observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 35th International Conference of High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP 2010)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207