MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793836700 · doi:10.1016/j.medipa.2017.03.006

Malestar emocional de pacientes y familiares en la Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos de un hospital general: un estudio piloto

2018· article· es· W2793836700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María José Zamora Muñoz, Manuel Valladares, Carlos J. van-der Hofstadt Román, Joaquín Portilla, Jesús Rodríguez Marín

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina Paliativa · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesPalliative careNursingArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La experiencia de una enfermedad avanzada genera malestar emocional en los pacientes y familiares. El objetivo del trabajo consiste en valorar un procedimiento de evaluación del malestar emocional del binomio paciente-cuidador en una UCP-HA de reciente creación, como un primer paso para reducirlo en la medida de lo posible. Se realizó un muestreo de conveniencia entre noviembre de 2015 y marzo de 2016. Fueron entrevistados 25 pacientes utilizando el índice de Barthel, el Cuestionario de Evaluación de Síntomas Edmonton y el Cuestionario de Detección del Malestar Emocional. Fueron evaluados 25 cuidadores mediante la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión y la Escala Zarit reducida. Se pudo evaluar al 37% de los pacientes y cuidadores ingresados en la UCP durante el periodo de estudio. Existe un alto nivel de malestar emocional en el 88% de los pacientes. En los cuidadores evaluados aparecen niveles altos de ansiedad y se observa sobrecarga del cuidador en el 80% según la Escala Zarit reducida. A pesar de las dificultades que conlleva evaluar a los pacientes con enfermedad avanzada y sus cuidadores, consideramos que estos procedimientos contribuyen a detectar el sufrimiento y promover su bienestar. The experience of an advanced disease causes emotional distress in patients and relatives. The objective of this paper is to assess a process of evaluation of emotional distress of both patients and caregivers in a recently created Palliative Care Unit of a General Hospital, as a first step towards reducing it as far as possible. A convenience sampling was used, from November 2015 to 2016 March. A total of 25 patients were interviewed using the Barthel Index, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and the questionnaire of Detection of Emotional Distress. Also 25 caregivers were interviewed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score and the reduced Zarit Scale. 37% of patients and caregivers admitted in the Palliative Care Unit during the period of study could be evaluated. A high level of emotional distress was detected among 88% of patients. Caregivers were observed to have high levels of anxiety and burden was detected in 80% according to the reduced Zarit Scale. Despite the difficulties involved in evaluating patients with advanced disease and their caregivers, we think these procedures contribute to detecting suffering and to promoting their wellness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicina PaliativaSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207