Full-Duplex Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in Cooperative Relay Sharing for 5G Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a full-duplex (FD) non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) scheme for a cooperative relay sharing network (termed as FD-NOMA-RS) is presented, in which two source-destination pairs share a dedicated FD relay FD-R. Following the principle of uplink NOMA, both sources transmit their symbols to FD-R, forming a NOMA pair, by depending on their channel conditions with respect to FD-R. The FD-R then decodes these symbols and simultaneously transmits a superimposed composite signal to the destinations with a processing delay τ according to the principle of downlink NOMA. The ergodic sum capacity, outage probability and outage sum capacity of FD-NOMA-RS are investigated comprehensively along with analytical derivations, considering both perfect and imperfect interference cancellation. A simulation is conducted to corroborate the correctness of the analysis presented here. Moreover, the effectiveness of FD-NOMA-RS is demonstrated through analysis and simulation and then compared with that of its counterpart, the half-duplex system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it