Bibliographic record
Abstract
On Heritage in the Filiation Narrative in the Male Gender. My article analyses a testimony of the return to origins published in 2009 by a famous voice in the contemporary Canadian French literature: Dany Laferrière, L’énigme du retour. The novel is built on the double geographical and mental route past-present, present-past, between the country of origin and the adoptive countries (Quebec and the United States), on activating individual and collective memory, on a favorite topos of the postmodern climate, viz. identity interrogation. It is complex, necessary to gaining wisdom. Once understood, accepted, assumed, it is no way perceived as heart-wrenching or vindictive, but instead it helps the author regain peace and evolve. The exile means liberation and return, identity loss and regain. This is a complex autobiography, with the most intimate writing of intimacy, an archeological inquiry collecting bribes/remnants of a troubled past. For Dany Laferrière, the direct paternal affiliation is sublimated, it fails, the heritage is taken over by a spiritual father and it aims at being relegated to the grandson. REZUMAT. Despre moştenire în romanul de filiaţie masculină. Articolul analizează o mărturie a întoarcerii la origini publicată în 2009 de o voce contemporană celebră în literatura canadiană de expresie franceză: Dany Laferrière, L’énigme du retour. Romanul este construit pe o dublă călătorie geografică şi mentală între trecut şi prezent, prezent şi trecut, între ţara de origine şi ţările de adopţie (Québec şi Statele Unite), antrenând atât memoria individuală, cât şi cea colectivă. Căutarea (şi găsirea) identităţii, proces complex, necesar pentru înţelepţire, este un topos de predilecţie în climatul postmodern. Odată înţeleasă, acceptată şi asumată, identitatea nu este percepută ca sfâşietoare sau vindicativă, ci, în schimb, îl ajută pe autor să-şi redobândească pacea şi să meargă mai departe, să evolueze. Exilul înseamnă eliberare şi întoarcere, pierderea şi recâştigarea identităţii. Avem de-a face cu o autobiografie complexă, cu o scriitură a intimului, cu o anchetă arheologică ce colectează frânturi dintr-un trecut tulbure. Dacă pentru Dany Laferrière filiaţia paternă este sublimată, chiar ratată, el devine la rândul lui părinte spiritual pentru nepotul lui căruia îi va transmite moştenirea. Cuvinte-cheie: identitate, exil, hibriditate, Haiti, moştenire, postmodern, intimitate
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".