La relation entre les problèmes de comportement et le surplus de poids chez des enfants québécois d’âge préscolaire : une étude transversale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude transversale examine la relation entre les problèmes de comportement intériorisés et extériorisés et le surplus de poids chez des enfants québécois âgés de 3 à 5 ans. En tout, 330 parents ont rempli la version canadienne-française de la Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5. Les enfants ont été classés dans la catégorie poids normal (3e au 85e centile) ou surplus de poids (> 85e centile). Les filles ayant un poids normal présentent des scores significativement plus élevés que les filles ayant un surplus de poids quant aux comportements intériorisés totaux ainsi qu’aux sous-échelles anxiété/dépression et retrait social. Pour les comportements extériorisés, aucune différence significative n’est observée parmi les enfants. Des études longitudinales sur la relation entre les problèmes comportementaux et le surplus de poids en bas âge sont nécessaires, afin de mieux documenter l’émergence et la direction de cette relation ainsi que les mécanismes impliqués.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".