Ultrasound: A Potential Tool for Detecting of Fasciitis in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Noda, et al regarding the presence of fasciitis among patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) and the association with myalgia1. The authors used histopathologically proven fasciitis cases to assess associations with clinical variables such as myalgia, muscle weakness, serology, interstitial lung disease, and malignancy. Previously, we have assessed fascia thickness of the proximal muscles deltoid, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris using muscle ultrasound (US) in 12 patients with DM or PM2. By comparison with healthy controls, we found a significant 2-fold increased fascia … Address correspondence to Dr. K.J. Bhansing, Radboud University Medical Center, Rheumatology, Geert Grooteplein 8, Nijmegen, 6500HB, the Netherlands. E-mail: k.bhansing{at}reuma.umcn.nl
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".