MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793940176 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.273

A272 PERFORMANCE OF TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODIES FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF CELIAC DISEASE IS DECREASED IN ADULTS WITH OTHER COMORBIDITIES

2018· article· en· W2793940176 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amélie Therrien, G Bernard, Nancy Presse, Pierre‐Olivier Hétu, Catherine Vincent, Mickaël Bouin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTissue transglutaminaseMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyBiopsyAntibodyInclusion and exclusion criteriaPopulationHistologyMedical recordDiseasePathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tissue transglutaminase antibodies(tTG) is a first step for detection of celiac disease(CeD). However, in a pediatric population, an increase of <3 times UNL was poorly predictive of CeD. In adults, discrepancies between tTG and histology were reported with liver disorders and how these and other comorbidities influence the performance of tTG remains unknown. To determine the positive predictive value(PPV) of the degree of increase of tTG for newly diagnosed biopsy-proven CeD(BxCeD) in adults with and without other comorbidities. Retrospective study based on chart review from August 2003 to June 2016. Inclusion criteria: all patients with a dosage of tTG at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and duodenal biopsies done three months before to six months after tTG. Exclusion criteria: inadequate histologic specimen, CeD already known or being on a gluten free diet. Patients were identified as BxCeD if histology corresponded to Marsh type 1 up to 3c. Medical records were reviewed for comordibities at the time of the dosage of tTG, namely liver disorders, auto-immune, infectious diseases and inflammatory states. Patients with and without these comorbidities were classified as Dis+ or Dis- groups. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the UNL threshold where sensitivity(Sn) and specificity(Sp) are optimized for diagnosis of BxCeD in both groups. PPVs below and above these thresholds were calculated and compared with Fisher’s exact tests. 206 patients were included; 63% of women; mean age(±SD) 48(±16)years. BxCeD was identified in 80% of patients(n=164). Overall, 73 patients were found with ≥1 relevant comorbidities(Dis+ group), mainly liver diseases(n=32), connective tissue diseases(n=11), and inflammatory bowel diseases(n=7). BxCeD was found in 60% of them while this proportion was of 90% in the Dis- group. ROC curve in the Dis- group revealed that Sp/Sn were optimized at 2.74 times UNL. When PPV were calculated according to this threshold (Table), PPVs were significantly lower in the Dis+ group vs. the Dis- group. In the Dis+ group, the threshold optimizing the Sp/Sn of the tTg test was 3.83 times UNL, which increased the PPV to 88% among these patients. The performance of the tTG test for detecting biopsy-proven CeD is decreased significantly by the presence of comorbidities such as liver disorders, other auto-immune diseases, infections, and inflammatory states. PPV of the tTG for BxCeD according to the presence of other comorbidities Dis +: either liver, auto-immune, infectious or inflammatory disease at the time of tTG None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207