MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects of a 6-month moderate-intensity exercise program on metabolic parameters and bone mineral density in men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

2018· article· en· W2793942823 on OpenAlexaff
Shabbir M.H. Alibhai, Sara Durbano, Meagan O’Neill, Daniel Santa Mina, Paul Ritvo, Catherine M. Sabiston, Murray Krahn, George Tomlinson, Andrew Matthew, Padraig Warde, Narhari Timilshina, Roanne Segal, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryOttawa HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto Public HealthCancer Care OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAndrogen deprivation therapyBone mineralProstate cancerFemoral neckRandomized controlled trialBone densityInternal medicineUrologyPhysical therapyCancerOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

237 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used to treat prostate cancer (PC) but is associated with significant side effects including metabolic abnormalities and bone loss. Although multiple trials have demonstrated that exercise is associated with improvements in multiple side effects of ADT, its effects on metabolic and skeletal outcomes is unclear. We conducted a phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing three different exercise delivery models. The present analysis examined prespecified endpoints of change in metabolic parameters and bone mineral density. Methods: Men with stage TxNxMx PC starting or continuing ADT for at least 6 months were enrolled and randomized equally to personal training (n = 18), supervised group training (n = 14), or home-based training (n = 16). Participants in all intervention arms underwent moderate to vigorous physical activity with a target of 150 minutes per week for 6 months. Fasting blood work and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were done at baseline and 6 months (blood work) and 12 months (DXA). Paired t-tests and ANCOVA were used to analyze findings. Results: 48 participants (mean age 69.9 years) were enrolled. The primary analysis demonstrated no significant difference between arms on most quality of life and fitness outcomes so groups were combined for the present analysis. Exercise was not associated with statistically significant changes in hemoglobin, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein, triglycerides, or fasting blood glucose (p = 0.075 to 0.87). Similarly, exercise was not associated with changes in bone mineral density at lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck sites on DXA (p = 0.44 to 0.71). Mean weight change was +0.8 kg. There was no difference between exercise arms on any outcome. Conclusions: Although our study is limited by a small sample size, our results suggest that 6 months of moderate intensity exercise is not associated with improvements in either metabolic or skeletal outcomes in men on ADT. More intensive behavioural interventions and/or pharmacological interventions will be required to reverse the deleterious effects of ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02046837.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→