Solar sorption cooling for residential air-conditioning applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the comparison of two sorption cooling systems for providing air conditioning in a residential building that can be driven by a flat plate solar collector. A thermodynamic model has been developed for each system to compare the energy balance in each component and the coefficient of performance (COP). Analyses have been performed for 10 kW water-ammonia absorption and activated carbon-ammonia adsorption chillers. For both systems, the first law efficiencies have been compared and the optimum efficiency has been investigated under different operating conditions. Analysis revealed that under any operating condition, the COP is always higher for the absorption chiller and its maximum value is 0.6, which is almost twice that of the adsorption chiller (COP = 0.35), for 10 kW systems operating at evaporator and condenser/absorber temperatures of 2°C and 30°C, respectively. The adsorption system requires a higher energy input to produce the same cooling effect as compared to the absorption system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".