MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A comparison of publicly available linear MRI stereotaxic registration techniques

2018· article· en· W2793958915 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahsa Dadar, Vladimir Fonov, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
FundersNIH Blueprint for Neuroscience ResearchNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNIH Office of the DirectorNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on AgingFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsAlzheimer's AssociationBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaGE HealthcareNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationServierRocheMcGill UniversityAstraZeneca CanadaF. Hoffmann-La RocheGovernment of CanadaGlaxoSmithKlineEli Lilly and CompanyGenentechMcDonnell Center for Systems NeuroscienceNovartisInnogeneticsCanada Foundation for InnovationAbbott CanadaPfizerJohnson and JohnsonSchering-PloughAbbVie
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNuclear medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207